Bird of Ill Repute
Jun
5
2009

A Good Book Ain’t All You Need

Cross-posted from The Deadline Dames.

This Friday writing post starts out with a question someone asked me on Twitter. (Look, I know–the publicity guy made me do it. I SWEAR.) Anyway, I often answer industry questions in my own little idiosyncratic way. This time someone asked me “Is writing a good book all you need to get an agent?”

Erm, well, how can I put this politely?

Oh, hell no.

A “good book” is not all you need. You also need discipline, people skills, the ability to follow directions and work well with others, patience, a thick skin–the list goes on and on. This is not easy, and the people who gain representation from agents or an editor’s attention do not “just write a good book” any more than Olympic athletes “just practice a little.”

It is important to “write a good book,” one that is as polished as you can make it. But that’s just a first step in a long journey. I won’t be talking about grammar, punctuation, or story here. I’m going to be talking about the process you need to go through to get other people excited about your work–excited enough that they will spend time and money promoting it and bringing it to other people. This is what agents and editors DO.

* First, recognize that agents and editors are not your adversaries. They are people who love books, love reading, and love the process of bringing a book to print. (They wouldn’t be doing this otherwise.) They also have to make a living, just like writers do. I’ve seen a lot of writers shoot themselves in the foot by getting combative about agents or editors. (Here’s a note to authors, aspiring and otherwise: the Internet is not private. ‘Nuff said.)

* Also, recognize that agents/editors read a LOT of CRAP. Let me tell you something. I read slush for a small press once. 97% of everything that made it past the first hoop (see below) had egregious spelling/punctuation/other errors in the first page–hell, mostly in the first paragraph. Those errors, which could have been fixed with a little bit of care, time, thought and effort, got those manuscripts ungraciously tossed. I am constantly amazed at people who think turning in a manuscript is like shooting off an email. (Or even a blog post. Ha.) It isn’t. I would bet that most of these were first drafts, and that none of them had been spell-checked; the authors thought they could speak English just fine, so what did they need to study sentence structure or punctuation for?

It’s enough to drive a reasonable person right off the cliff. No wonder slush-readers get dyspeptic.

* Follow simple directions. The 97% I refer to above was actually only about 10% of manuscripts I received. The initial 90% arriving at my desk did not follow submission guidelines. So they didn’t even make it past the starting gate.

Let me be ruthlessly honest here. (You knew I would be, anyway.) Submissions guidelines exist for two reasons: to make it easier for the agents to organize, and to find out which “writers” can obey simple rules. If you cannot follow simple submissions guidelines (here’s an example of simple guidelines,) how in the bloody blue blazes can an agent or editor trust you with complex revision tasks, overlapping schedules or in-house proofing rules?

Do not underestimate the utility of a brief, polite email or long-distance call to simply inquire if the posted submissions guidelines are still relevant or if they’ve changed. Do your homework, read the directions, read the listings in Writer’s Market. It will get your manuscript past the first gate.

* Be a flippin’ professional. (This is part of the SECRET-that-isn’t.) You expect an agent to spend his/her time (which is money, because they get paid according to what they sell) pushing your book? You expect a publisher to lay out an advance, the cost of paper, the cost of man-hours editing and typesetting, and the cost of marketing to publish your book? When they don’t initially know you from Adam?

Puh-leeze. You have to EARN that trust before they open their checkbooks. Part of earning that trust is acting like this is a job, and acting according to reasonable rules of human politeness.

A lot of people try to break into publishing because they have a bone-deep belief that they are Speshul and that regular rules don’t apply to them. A teaspoon of that self-love might be healthy, but more than that is like too much pepper–it turns a tasty dish into an inedible mess. Yes, you’re Speshul. Just like everyone else. And like everyone else, you need to get along with other human beings or you won’t get what you want.

Writing is a weird Jekyll-and-Hyde sort of career. There’s just YOU and THE PAGE for a great deal of it. Then there’s the other bit, where you have to get along with agents and editors, not to mention readers at conventions and signings. People skills are necessary, as are patience and a thick skin. You have to avoid and deal with the hard sell. (Hint: it doesn’t work.)

* Be patient, and continue. Agents and editors are constantly looking out for new, fresh voices. They are also constantly swamped. Publishing is a waiting game. While you’re waiting for a rejection letter, you could drive yourself crazy–or you could be working on the next book. The former will drive you, well, crazy. The latter gives you something to do, gives you practice, and widens the number of manuscripts you can have out in the world looking for a home. I call this the “shotgun theory” of publishing. If you keep writing and submitting properly, the chances keep going up that something that you’ve written will find a home somewhere.

I often mention that I was lucky, because a lot of things fell into place for me career-wise. What I say right afterward (and what a lot of newbie “writers” ignore) is that I worked very hard for eight to ten years before my first moment of luck, and worked my ass off afterward so that when more luck came, I was ready to take full advantage of it instead of letting it wither. Flogging just one manuscript is a fool’s game, despite the occasional lottery-winning one-manuscript wonder. I’d rather pay the rent consistently.

* Don’t be precious. I guarantee you, the agents and editors have seen it all before. They’ve had people try to bribe them with chocolate and other assorted things. They’ve had manuscripts arrived on scented, colored paper. They’ve been the victims of well-meaning but incredibly creepy self-promotion from anxious and overeager writers. Don’t be That Guy.

No, you don’t “just need a good book.” You need hard work, professionalism, people skills–all those things you need to be successful in any career, and especially any freelance arts career. Mind you, I’m not saying that people skills can cover up a pile of crap in manuscript form, either. But when I’m working as an editor and I’m given a choice between a Werke of Geeenyus from a Preshus Speshul Snoflake Who The Rules Don’t Apply To or a reasonably solid and decent manuscript from a Professional, I will inevitably take the latter. Because manuscripts can be revised and edited and helped. Speshul Snowflakes…can’t.

Over and out.

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. On QueryFail, Or, The Lilybed of Grief
  2. The Hard Sell Doesn’t Work
  3. Know The Rules, Love The Rules, Break The Rules

Tags: , , , ,

12 Responses to “A Good Book Ain’t All You Need”

  1. T.S. Says:

    There’s something else I want to add:

    All of these things are important, not just because of what Lili said above, but also because at the end of the day, it is very hard to be objective about your own work*. So what you might think of as a “good book” might not be for many different reasons. Maybe you’re not as good a writer as you think you are, maybe you didn’t kill your darlings, maybe it’s well-written but familiar or the voice is great but the characters need developing. But you’re just too close to the work to tell.

    As Lili said, agents and editors are inundated regularly with everyone’s idea of a “good book” and most of those don’t work out. So those other points are really important and when we find a good book that works for us, you can bet we’ll be jumping to work for you. But if you don’t follow those rules, it won’t matter.

    *Obviously the more books an author has published, the easier it gets to be able to tell how much revising a manuscript is going to need. But the objectivity factor is the reason there are agents and editors in the first place. We’re not magical fairies who know more than the average joe. We’re just objective eyes who also happen to know the market and what has worked, is working and may work in the future.

    Lili, thanks for posting this! I may re-post the link in a blog or Tweet.

  2. Jack Says:

    Very well written, its sad that it needed to be said though. I work in a service type industry and everyone is a “Speshul Snowflake” its actually quite sad. Thanks for a very thought provoking post.

  3. Russ Says:

    awesome

  4. Rachel Caine Says:

    Lili — you ROCK. Wow, what an incredibly good post!

    Sent over by the marvelous Lucienne … so glad I came!

    Rachel

  5. Shadow_Ferret Says:

    Seems to me that a good book would win out. Because that, aside from the query letter and synopsis, is what the agents see first. They don’t see any of that other stuff, your people skills or ability to take directions until AFTER they’ve read a full.

    The decision to represent is made on how good the book is. At least that’s how I think the industry works. It’s what gets your foot in the door.

    Or am I way off base?

  6. Diana Peterfreund Blog | Lots o’ Links and a Video Says:

    [...] Saintcrow is off on another one of her exquisite rants about the publishing industry in “a good book ain’t all you need.” Check it [...]

  7. [links] Link salad stumbles into Tuesday | jlake.com Says:

    [...] A good book ain’t all you need. — Lilith Saintcrow on writers and agents. [...]

  8. If You Give a Girl a Pen… » Blog Archive Says:

    [...] http://www.lilithsaintcrow.com/journal/2009/06/a-good-book-aint-all-you-need/ [...]

  9. jsprunk70 Says:

    Wise words to live by.

    Good luck doesn’t just happen (to most of us). It’s backed by years of hard work. Blood, sweat, tears — the whole nine.

  10. eden tyler Says:

    I’m a girl with a pen, and one of the other girls blogged about this post today. (@ giveagirlapen.com)
    And I’m so glad she did.
    This is grand advice—and so true.

    I feel sorry for all the people out there with just that one book they are dreaming will get published and they believe is so perfect that no one should dare criticize it.
    That, along with everything else you said is what I’m shooting to NOT be like…

    Thanks for posting this!!
    -e*

  11. Chloe Says:

    Fabulous post with great advice.

    “READ THE SUBMISSION GUIDELINES” is one of my most frequently-proffered bits of advice. Submission guidelines provide the rules of the game (but, of course, you still have to be a good player and be fluent in the rules of sportsmanship and etiquette).

  12. Marsha Lyn Says:

    Thanks for this post, love the advice! It’s sad how some people go into the writing & publishing experience with an additude that they have been imbued with some earth shattering talent. People who expect to get a publisher their first shot out the gate and to make millions as a result. They’re in for quite a shock..or some maturing, maybe both..
    I’m surprised that you even had to include being a professional, it’s difficult for me to grasp the notion that there are people out there who are acting anything but professional. This is a job, just like any other job, and you’re inevitably going to be forced to do something that isn’t tons of fun but needs to be done. When you’re going for an interview (for a new job) or dealing with your boss and coworkers, you have to act professionally. I thought it was a given!
    It’s sad that these points had to be said seeing how basic and common sense they are. You wouldn’t hand in an assignment to your teacher that isn’t properly done so why do people think they can get away with it when it comes to getting published? I’m shocked by the number of people, by the sound of it, who don’t use their brain when trying to be published. Wow!
    Once again, thank you so much for the great post! Very eye opening.