On Groups, Workshops, And Agendas
Welcome to your regular Friday writing post! Come in, sit down, have a drink. Let’s talk about groups. I’ll warn you that a lot of people are going to disagree with a lot of what I say here. That’s life. Don’t read unless you want to know my opinion.
Okay.
Let me begin by saying that I know writer’s groups, critique groups, and workshops do work for some people. I know a few (far too few, IMHO, but that’s beside the point) people have been helped by them. I don’t dispute that under the proper conditions and with the proper safeguards, they can be safe and fun. So can cars, stand-up comedy, juggling, and sex.
But I don’t attend workshops and I don’t have a group. I very rarely (like once a year at OryCon) partake in a critique group. I am very wary of workshops and groups in general, just like I’m wary of writing “classes”. It’s all because of ersatz jolts and agendas.
Writing is hard, and support and community are good. I don’t dispute that. I do have what I consider a community, and a good beta reader. I find both invaluable–but it took me a long time to find either. I had to find people whose agendas matched mine.
My agenda is to make rent as a professional writer, and to have as little bullshit as possible going on around my work. This means I have no time or patience for the usual “critique” group or workshop.
This is not the fault of the really earnest and dedicated people who organize or attend. It’s the fault of the Speshul Snowflakes and predators, conscious or unconscious. It’s also the fault of the “self-help” component of lots of classes, workshops, and groups. Let’s talk about that component first.
I don’t like self-help books for the same reason I don’t like writing books, or the diet industry. If there was a magic bullet that let you do all these things without hard work, the billion-dollar industries would tank overnight. While there might be one or two things of value in these books, people end up mistaking the effort of reading them for effort toward changing whatever it is they’re unhappy about. It’s an ersatz jolt that people mistake for real work. After a while it wears off, and you run to the bookstore, begging another self-help book to take your money and give you that jolt again.
This is the trap.
Notice that I do not dispute there is some use to self-help, writing, or diet books. But to my mind, that use is far outweighed by the risk of mistaking the passive effort of reading for the active effort of doing the damn work. I fully admit to falling into this trap over and over again until I realized nothing was changing and got disgusted with the whole thing. Even now I feel the siren song of self-help or diet books. It’s hard to resist that prettily-packaged temptation.
I see a lot of talented and otherwise self-directed new/young writers getting caught in the trap of mistaking the emotional jolt of workshops or crit groups as a valid replacement for the thankless slog of writing every day, submitting and getting rejected, and just generally working your ass off for very little pay. Which, to be honest, is what writing is. I view workshops and crit groups as a nice occasional condiment, but in no way comparable to the main course. So to speak.
I realize that I come to this as a working writer with kids to feed. Mine is not the only writing “agenda”. There are hobbyists, people who don’t want/need to make a living but do want to get published, and then there are the Speshul Snowflakes. Any time you have a group setting, you have people with different agendas. And there are those people whose agendas are not about writing, per se.
These are the people with emotional agendas who hijack groups and workshops. Suddenly the group/workshop is not about writing, it’s about Them And Their Drama. They can get Passive-Aggressive, Abusive, Loud, or just plain Backstabbing And Horrid.
This is the largest reason why I don’t do groups and workshops. I have seen too many of them get hijacked by a Speshul Effing Snowflake like the Beethoven Blonde. (You’ll have to scroll down for the story, in that link.) Or by the person who can’t take honest crit because YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND THEIR GEEEEENIUS; the person that doesn’t need an editor because editors only cramp their style, dontcha know; the person who is so avant-garde and groundbreaking that The Business Won’t Understand Them–do I have to go on? If you’ve attended a group or a workshop, I will bet you money you’ve encountered one of these, or one of the many others I could list.
These people waste a lot of time. In a group, they can be toxic because sharing one’s writing is an emotionally vulnerable exercise. There are people who are writing and crit-group predators. (Any source of vulnerability/prey will draw them. This is just a fact of life.) If the group dynamics don’t exclude them and exclude them HARD, they will destroy your group, do their best to destroy your peace of mind, and move on to the next feeding-ground. So many writer’s groups have no boundaries when it comes to interpersonal behavior.
Let’s face it: critique can get very personal with very little provocation. It’s a recipe for disaster.
With workshops, you get a slightly different class of predator–the predators who paid to be there just like the folks who honestly want to get writing practice/advice instead of drama out of the workshop. Forking over the cash does give them some rights, but not the right to completely hijack the workshop and behave inappropriately. If the people running the workshop don’t watch and set boundaries (and refuse to take any shit), the situation quickly becomes unbearably toxic, and a complete and total waste of money and time for the people who really needed to get something other than drama out of it.
Because of the emotional component of writing, and because of the way we treat creativity and artists in our society, groups and workshops are playgrounds for predators, from the sad and pathetic passive-aggressive to the finely-tuned killing machine. Writing groups implode regularly from this type of stress, so do crit groups. Perennial workshop attendees can be predators, dead weight, or people mistaking the drama and ersatz jolt of a workshop for real work.
The chance of drawing a decent writing group or attending a workshop that won’t get hijacked is, to my mind, analogous to the chance of winning the lotto or having an airplane part fall out of the sky onto your head. It CAN happen, sure. But my money is on writing every day and getting to the point where you can spot the people with Emotional Agendas, not writing agendas–and AVOID THEM LIKE THE FRICKIN’ PLAGUE. Then you’re ready to sift through your community, online or not, and find a good beta reader or a nicely-balanced group, if you really think you need one.
Community is a wonderful thing. I have a great one, and I have a beta reader who is worth her weight in gold. Literally. (Yes, Selkie, I’m talking about you.) It took me over a decade to find my beta, and I had to function as a professional, largely on my own and without a community, for a long time before I did.
If you need a group, if you really think you need workshops, fine. If that works for you, go for it.
Just be careful and watch out. It’s a dangerous jungle out there.
Good luck.
Related posts:


December 12th, 2008 at 1:12 pm
Hi, please explain Beta Reader? Also what source do you use to find the words milaya & verscht za?
My computer won’t let me email you with your link. Wants me to set up an internet connections wizard. Vista…
Thanks so much for your books! Keep em coming.
Hope
December 12th, 2008 at 4:22 pm
Writing groups are definitely a mixed bag. I would add to your list an additional problem: Lack of actual critique.
Back in my reporting days, one of my jobs was to review books by local authors. Almost all were self-published; some were astoundingly good.
One was beyond awful.
The lady who wrote it had clearly worked hard and long on it. She was a member of a writing group which had been “so supportive, I felt bathed in love.” (Yes really. I heard all about it because she called me EVERY DAY to see if I’d read her book yet. Thank God it was an election year and I was mainly a political reporter, so I could truthfully say I’d been busy.)
Oh, the book was bad. The characters changed personality mid-stream; the plot was incomprehensible. One would think her writing group would at least have caught the two chapters that had been physically switched. (One was Chapter Three, the other Chapter Twelve…) But no. The group loved it. I heard from them too. “Couldn’t you just tell her it was good?”
That is surely kind, shoring up the ego of someone who evidently needed it. But it did not make her a better writer.
BTW, I recommend a couple years in journalism for anyone who wants to write; you lose the attitude real fast, learn to write on tight deadlines, and get used to negative feedback. Also you get a regular paycheck.
December 12th, 2008 at 10:02 pm
Yep, if people just did instead of reading about doing, maybe they could have a sense of accomplishment… but I’m not cynical at all:)
January 2nd, 2009 at 12:35 pm
[...] much, but it is huge. The wrong kind of critique can kill a work in those tender first stages, and someone with an emotional agenda can eff up your love of your work beyond [...]